Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Cheap Interaction = Advantage

Brands are perhaps the most intuitive example of cheap interaction’s atomizing hand. Yesterday, they were a potent source of advantage. Today, the game has changed: investing in traditional brands is yielding fast diminishing returns, and leading more and more players directly into value destruction. That’s why it’s not just revolutionaries like Google, but also mass-market giants like Nike and P&G, who are rethinking orthodox branding.

The Shrinking Advantage of Brands
How to Build a Brand on the Web? Ask Unilever

No comments: